[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17046992#comment-17046992 ]
Ismaël Mejía commented on BEAM-9288: ------------------------------------ Is this a real issue or just a nice to have, because if it is the former this implies a new release of the vendored grpc dependency with the respective 3 day vote, is this really important or can we just wait and do it for 2.21.0 ? > Conscrypt shaded dependency > --------------------------- > > Key: BEAM-9288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build-system > Reporter: Esun Kim > Assignee: sunjincheng > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.20.0 > > Time Spent: 1h 50m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I > happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt > (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought > by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this > case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt. > *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030 > *2: > [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78] > *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136 > *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0] > *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889 > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)