[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17046992#comment-17046992
]
Ismaël Mejía edited comment on BEAM-9288 at 2/27/20 9:38 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Is this a real issue or just a nice to have, because if it is the former this
implies a new release of the vendored grpc dependency with the respective 3 day
vote, delaying as a consequence the 2.20.0 vote/release. Is this really
important or can we just wait and do it for 2.21.0 ?
was (Author: iemejia):
Is this a real issue or just a nice to have, because if it is the former this
implies a new release of the vendored grpc dependency with the respective 3 day
vote, is this really important or can we just wait and do it for 2.21.0 ?
> Conscrypt shaded dependency
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-9288
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build-system
> Reporter: Esun Kim
> Assignee: sunjincheng
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.20.0
>
> Time Spent: 1h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I
> happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt
> (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought
> by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this
> case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt.
> *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030
> *2:
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78]
> *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136
> *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0]
> *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
