[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17065015#comment-17065015
 ] 

Maximilian Michels commented on BEAM-9573:
------------------------------------------

I understand that this may mean additional work for you as a release manager. 
I'm sorry but we can't release with a bug like this.

Is this a regression from a previous release? Yes.
Is this a new feature or related to a new feature? It's a new feature. Timer 
output timestamps.
What percentage of users would be impacted by this issue if it is not fixed? 
100% of the users.
Would it be possible for the impacted users to skip this version? I can't 
answer this question.

> Watermark hold for timer output timestamp is not computed correctly
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-9573
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9573
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: runner-flink
>    Affects Versions: 2.20.0
>            Reporter: Maximilian Michels
>            Assignee: Maximilian Michels
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.20.0
>
>
> With the introduction of timer output timestamp, a new watermark hold had 
> been added to the Flink Runner. The watermark computation works on the keyed 
> state backend which computes a key-scoped watermark hold and not the desired 
> operator-wide watermark hold.
> Computation: 
> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/b564239081e9351c56fb0e7d263495b95dd3f8f3/runners/flink/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/runners/flink/translation/wrappers/streaming/DoFnOperator.java#L1140
> Key-scoped state: 
> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/b564239081e9351c56fb0e7d263495b95dd3f8f3/runners/flink/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/runners/flink/translation/wrappers/streaming/DoFnOperator.java#L1130
> We need to change this to operate on all keys. This has to be done before 
> fixing BEAM-9566.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to