[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17068938#comment-17068938
 ] 

Alexey Romanenko edited comment on BEAM-9439 at 3/27/20, 5:56 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for reporting this.  Do you have any fix for that or an idea how 
{{getSplitBacklogBytes()}} could be implemented?

Also, I'd ask [~pawel.kaczmarczyk], who initially worked on BEAM-2455, why 
{{getTotalBacklogBytes()}} was used in this case?


was (Author: aromanenko):
Thank you for reporting this.  I'd ask [~pawel.kaczmarczyk], who initially 
worked on BEAM-2455, why {{getTotalBacklogBytes()}} was used in this case?

> KinesisReader does not report correct backlog statistics 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-9439
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9439
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: io-java-kinesis
>            Reporter: Sam Whittle
>            Priority: Major
>
> The KinesisReader implementing KinesisIO reports backlog by implementing the
> UnboundedSource.getTotalBacklogBytes()
> method as opposed to the
> UnboundedSource.getSplitBacklogBytes()
> This value is supposed to represent the total backlog across all shards.  
> This function is implemented by calling 
> SimplifiedKinesisClient.getBacklogBytes with the watermark of the kinesis 
> shards managed within the UnboundedReader instance.  As this watermark may be 
> further ahead than the watermark across all shards, this may miss backlog 
> bytes.
> An additional concern is that the watermark is calculated using a 
> WatermarkPolicy, which means that the watermark may be inconsistent to the 
> kinesis timestamp for querying backlog.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to