reddycharan commented on a change in pull request #1228: Issue #570: Move logic 
of unpersistedbytes to bufferedchannel
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1228#discussion_r172461503
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/bookie/BufferedChannel.java
 ##########
 @@ -110,11 +150,15 @@ public long getFileChannelPosition() {
      * @throws IOException if the write or sync operation fails.
      */
     public void flush(boolean shouldForceWrite) throws IOException {
+        flush(shouldForceWrite, false);
+    }
+
+    public void flush(boolean shouldForceWrite, boolean forceMetadata) throws 
IOException {
         synchronized (this) {
 
 Review comment:
   > There's no refactor involved here. flush(boolean,boolean) isn't even 
called, so if it's removed, you will only have update flush(boolean).
   
   It is not true. I'm planning to use in my next subtask. You can check how 
this method is used in my comprehensive PR - 
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1201 . We had quite big conversation 
regarding why 'forceMetadata' flag is required - (final conclusion of the 
conversation) - 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201705.mbox/%3CCAO2yDyahWu0ezJmQ66sdOvZBUofQu%3D8CabPDeH5JTRzkMULUCg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
 This conversation happened in May2017 for full thread - 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201705.mbox/browser 

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to