[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15180436#comment-15180436
]
Josh Elser edited comment on CALCITE-1077 at 3/4/16 7:48 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
[~julianhyde], if you have a moment, it would be good to get your input.
{{/avatica}} is no longer built via the top-level calcite pom. I copied the
"calcite site" into {{/avatica}} and made some modifications (some place
holders too until the first release is made). It should "slot" into the Calcite
site at {{https://calcite.apache.org/avatica}}.
LMK what you think?
was (Author: elserj):
[~julianhyde], if you have a moment, it would be good to get your input.
{{/avatica} is no longer built via the top-level calcite pom. I copied the
"calcite site" into {{/avatica}} and made some modifications (some place
holders too until the first release is made). It should "slot" into the Calcite
site at {{https://calcite.apache.org/avatica}}.
LMK what you think?
> Separate Avatica from "core" Calcite build
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-1077
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1077
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: avatica
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> Uber-JIRA-issue for tracking the separation of Avatica from the rest of the
> Calcite build.
> Long term, Avatica can be a standalone project, but we're not there yet in
> terms of governance (enough people intimately involved). One thing we can do
> now is to separate Avatica from Calcite and begin "getting them used to" not
> being next to one another.
> DISCUSS thread:
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/calcite-dev/201601.mbox/%3C56ABCCFF.3010205%40gmail.com%3E
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
