[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245812#comment-15245812
]
Josh Elser commented on CALCITE-1192:
-------------------------------------
bq. For the bytes_value field, I believe it should be bytes_values as per
Ugh, that is extremely unfortunate. That's a typo in the proto definition,
rather than a documentation issue. I'm not sure if that's something we can
change without breaking protobuf compat, but that's going to be how I'd like to
fix it.
bq. Also, I think it would be useful to have some notes regarding the time
values, for example:
Ahh, I had added this for the JSON docs, but forgot to do it for the Protobuf
docs. I will amend that.
> Document protobuf and json REP types with examples
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-1192
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1192
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: avatica
> Reporter: Francis Chuang
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Fix For: avatica-1.8.0
>
>
> It would be nice to have the documentation for the Rep types here
> (https://calcite.apache.org/docs/avatica_protobuf_reference.html#rep)
> documented with examples to show what the serialized representation looks
> like.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
