[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15371824#comment-15371824
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1313:
--------------------------------------

That test is using RelToSql not SqlToRel but yes, the validator should test 
type when it expands. Add that query to SqlToRelConverterTest and you'll kill 
two birds with one stone.

> expandOrderExpr() does not validate node type and properly set it
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-1313
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1313
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: MinJi Kim
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> Queries like the following currently fail in SqlToRelConverter because the 
> type in thought to be unknown.  Simple fix is to ensure that the type is 
> validated when we expand the expression.
> {code}
> java.lang.AssertionError: Parsing failed throwing error: class 
> org.apache.calcite.sql.SqlBasicCall: ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY 
> `employee`.`store_id` ORDER BY `employee`.`department_id` ROWS BETWEEN 
> UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW)
>       at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.rel.rel2sql.RelToSqlConverterTest.checkRel2Sql(RelToSqlConverterTest.java:58)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.rel.rel2sql.RelToSqlConverterTest.checkRel2Sql(RelToSqlConverterTest.java:63)
>       at 
> org.apache.calcite.rel.rel2sql.RelToSqlConverterTest.testOver(RelToSqlConverterTest.java:391)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
>       at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
>       at 
> com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:69)
>       at 
> com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:234)
>       at 
> com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:74)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to