[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16549397#comment-16549397
 ] 

Enrico Olivelli commented on CALCITE-2395:
------------------------------------------

Except from SQL92 standard I cannot find any different cases of SELECT xxx FOR 
UPDATE OF id,id,id....

in PostGre seems that they support 'FOR UPDATE' with 'OF' and docs tell about 
'*tables*'

see:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/sql-select.html

 

In Oracle I am finding only examples like this

[https://www.techonthenet.com/oracle/cursors/for_update.php]

that is
{code:java}
CURSOR xxx IS
SELECT xxx
FROM ...
FOR UPDATE OF table.colum, table.column2


{code}
 

So it is only with 'CURSOR' and with a list of *columns* (not tables)

 

Therefore I can't find any support for "CURSOR IS" in Calcite.

I wonder if and how we can support "FOR UPDATE OF" in a consistent way with DMBS

 

Maybe I am missing one piece of the story, I am not an Oracle expert.

I am continuing the implementation following [~julianhyde] 's suggestions, but 
I would like to have a 'real world' counterpart of what I an doing.

Any help/guidance is really appreciated

 

 

> Support SELECT xxx FROM TABLE FOR UPDATE syntax
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2395
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2395
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.16.0
>            Reporter: Enrico Olivelli
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>            Priority: Major
>
> I am using Calcite SQL Parser and Volcano Planner.
> I need to support SQL syntax
> SELECT ... FROM table FOR UPDATE
>  
> see for instance PostGre docs
> [https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/sql-select.html.]
>  
> I would like at least to support this syntax at SQL Parser level, the 'for 
> update' spec should be reported by the RelNode so that the system can take it 
> into account and perform explicit locking.
>  
> Linked downstream project issue:
> https://github.com/diennea/herddb/issues/228
>  
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to