[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16805907#comment-16805907 ]
Haisheng Yuan commented on CALCITE-2954: ---------------------------------------- [~vgarg] Can you add this query to the test case? This will match {{SubQueryJoinRemoveRule}}. {code:java} "select empno\n" + "from sales.emp as r left join sales.dept as s\n" + "on exists (select deptno from sales.emp where empno = s.deptno+20)"; {code} > SubQueryJoinRemoveRule and SubQueryProjectRemoveRule passing on empty set > instead of set of correlation id > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CALCITE-2954 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2954 > Project: Calcite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core > Reporter: Vineet Garg > Assignee: Vineet Garg > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available, sub-query > Time Spent: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Call to {{apply}} takes set of {{CorrelationId}} but both > {{SubQueryJoinRemoveRule}} and {{SubQueryProjectRemoveRule}} are passing > empty set for whatever reason. > I believe the correct thing to do here is to pass on the actual set of > {{CorrelationId}} like {{SubQueryFilterRemoveRule}} > Ref: > {code:java} > final RexNode target = apply(e, ImmutableSet.of(), > logic, builder, 2, fieldCount); > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)