[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16844641#comment-16844641
 ] 

Khawla Mouhoubi commented on CALCITE-2979:
------------------------------------------

After discussing the matter with [~zabetak] and [~rubenql], a good way to start 
would be implementing a block based version of the 
EnumerableDefaults.correlateJoin or EnumerableDefaults.thetaJoin. There needs 
to be a new operator which implementation will be close to EnumerableCorrelate 
but with blocks of correlation variables and bloom filters applied to the inner 
table. A new rule will do the following:
{code:java}
Join(A.id = B.id)
  Scan(A)
  Scan(B){code}
Will be turned into:
{code:java}
NestedLoop(blockSize=3)
  Scan(A)
  Filter(OR(=(cor0[0],B.id), =(cor0[1],B.id), =(cor0[2],B.id))
    Scan(B)
{code}
 

> Add a block-based nested loop join algorithm
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2979
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2979
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.19.0
>            Reporter: Stamatis Zampetakis
>            Assignee: Khawla Mouhoubi
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: performance
>
> Currently, Calcite provides a tuple-based nested loop join algorithm 
> implemented through EnumerableCorrelate and EnumerableDefaults.correlateJoin. 
> This means that for each tuple of the outer relation we probe (set variables) 
> in the inner relation.
> The goal of this issue is to add new algorithm (or extend the correlateJoin 
> method) which first gathers blocks (batches) of tuples from the outer 
> relation and then probes the inner relation once per block.
> There are cases (eg., indexes) where the inner relation can be accessed by 
> more than one value which can greatly improve the performance in particular 
> when the outer relation is big.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to