[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16887405#comment-16887405
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3031:
--------------------------------------
"correlated predicate quantifiers" is jargon. I don't understand it, and it
will make no sense in the release notes. Can you change the bug title and the
commit message to clarify.
> AssertionError: correlation id $cor0 not found in correlation list []
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-3031
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3031
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Haisheng Yuan
> Assignee: Vineet Garg
> Priority: Major
>
> Repro:
> {code:java}
> @Test public void testSelectAnyCorrelated() {
> final String sql = "select empno > any(select deptno from dept where
> emp.job = dept.name) from emp\n"
> ;
> checkSubQuery(sql).withLateDecorrelation(true).check();
> }
> {code}
> Error:
> {code:java}
> java.lang.AssertionError: correlation id $cor0 not found in correlation list
> []
> at org.apache.calcite.util.Litmus$1.fail(Litmus.java:31)
> at
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexChecker.visitCorrelVariable(RexChecker.java:174)
> at
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexChecker.visitCorrelVariable(RexChecker.java:57)
> at
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexCorrelVariable.accept(RexCorrelVariable.java:47)
> at
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexVisitorImpl.visitFieldAccess(RexVisitorImpl.java:98)
> at
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexChecker.visitFieldAccess(RexChecker.java:149)
> at
> org.apache.calcite.rex.RexChecker.visitFieldAccess(RexChecker.java:57)
> at org.apache.calcite.rex.RexFieldAccess.accept(RexFieldAccess.java:81)
> at org.apache.calcite.rex.RexChecker.visitCall(RexChecker.java:140)
> at org.apache.calcite.rex.RexChecker.visitCall(RexChecker.java:57)
> at org.apache.calcite.rex.RexCall.accept(RexCall.java:191)
> at org.apache.calcite.rel.core.Filter.isValid(Filter.java:120)
> at
> org.apache.calcite.test.SqlToRelConverterTest$RelValidityChecker.visit(SqlToRelConverterTest.java:3312)
> at org.apache.calcite.rel.SingleRel.childrenAccept(SingleRel.java:72)
> at org.apache.calcite.rel.RelVisitor.visit(RelVisitor.java:44)
> {code}
> The plan after SubQueryRemoveRule is:
> {code:xml}
> LogicalProject(EXPR$0=[CAST(OR(AND(IS TRUE(>($0, $9)), <>($10, 0)),
> AND(>($10, $11), null, <>($10, 0), IS NOT TRUE(>($0, $9))), AND(>($0, $9),
> <>($10, 0), IS NOT TRUE(>($0, $9)), <=($10, $11)))):BOOLEAN NOT NULL])
> LogicalJoin(condition=[true], joinType=[inner])
> LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])
> LogicalAggregate(group=[{}], m=[MIN($0)], c=[COUNT()], d=[COUNT($0)])
> LogicalProject(DEPTNO=[$0])
> LogicalFilter(condition=[=($cor0.JOB, $1)])
> LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, DEPT]])
> {code}
> It should be a Correlate, instead of a Join.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
