[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17009375#comment-17009375 ]
Haisheng Yuan commented on CALCITE-3285: ---------------------------------------- If we change to mergeJoin(...).where(...), why don't we just revert the code? > EnumerableMergeJoin should support non-equi join conditions > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CALCITE-3285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3285 > Project: Calcite > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Haisheng Yuan > Assignee: Jin Xing > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 1.22.0 > > Time Spent: 2h 50m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Calcite should be able to generate EnumerableMergeJoin with non-equi join > conditions, as long as there are equi-join conditions. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)