[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17073454#comment-17073454
]
Stamatis Zampetakis commented on CALCITE-3871:
----------------------------------------------
I think it makes sense to keep the apiguardian on our side.
Other than that the concern raised by [~danny0405] is valid. We should be more
careful with the dependencies from version to version.
Should we add a new task for the RM to verify the differences in dependencies
and act accordingly (notify dev@...)?
{noformat}
git diff calcite-1.22.0..master -- gradle.properties
{noformat}
> Remove dependency of org.apiguardian:apiguardian-api
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-3871
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3871
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core, linq4j
> Affects Versions: 1.22.0
> Reporter: Danny Chen
> Assignee: Danny Chen
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The org.apiguardian:apiguardian-api is introduced in CALCITE-3652 in order to
> mark the new introduced API status.
> Remove the dependency and copy the class into Calcite because the
> org.apiguardian:apiguardian-api jar has only a single API.java class and it
> is not necessary to add a dependency for that(All the downstream projects
> that have calcite-core as a dependency would see this jar which is annoying).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
