[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17127240#comment-17127240
 ] 

Xiening Dai commented on CALCITE-3963:
--------------------------------------

Thanks for your reply, Julian.

I don't feel that current RelSet can be modeled as semigroups. What would be 
the binary operation that satisfies associative property in RelSet? 

My approach actually is pretty straightforward. I use the first RelNode in the 
set by default to report RelSubset statistics, with two exceptions MultiJoin 
and TableScan (for MV). Following the same approach, I update the other meta 
handlers, and it works fine. We no longer need the hacks put in previously 
(such as CALCITE-1018), and there's no more ambiguities around RelSubset stats 
calculation. See latest patch - https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1992

I'd suggest we move forward with current approach. If there's a need in the 
future for a fold operation across RelSubset, we could still update meta 
handler to do so. But at this point, I don't see it is necessary.

> Maintain logical properties at RelSet (equivalent group) instead of RelNode
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3963
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3963
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Xiening Dai
>            Assignee: Xiening Dai
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently the logical properties (such as row count, distinct row count, etc) 
> are maintained at RelNode level. This creates a number of meta data 
> consistency problems, e.g. CALCITE-1048, CALCITE-2166. 
> In theory, all RelNodes in a RelSet should share the same logical properties 
> per definition of relational equivalence. So it makes more sense to keep 
> logical properties at RelSet level, rather than the RelNode. And such 
> properties shouldn't change when new sub set is created or subset's best is 
> changed.
> Specifically I think below build in metadata should fall into the logical 
> properties category -
> Selectivity
> UniqueKeys
> ColumnUniqueness
> RowCount
> MaxRowCount
> MinRowCount
> DistinctRowCount
> Size (averageRowSize, averageColumnSize)
>  
>  
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to