[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17141268#comment-17141268
 ] 

Danny Chen commented on CALCITE-3786:
-------------------------------------

> Could you please enlighten me on how to properly customize it?

Just implement the #explainTerms correctly with the items you want to involve 
in.

> Or My operator has some additional field, that participate in the operator 
> identity, aka digest comparison, but I don't want to output it in the explain 
> terms, is there anyway I can achieve this?

Use different SqlExplainLevel to distinguish just like before.

> Object#hashCode and #equals final so that we have a bug-free world.

I think things are much different when there are 3 methods there, especially 
when we are talking about "semantic equivalent" not strict #equals. And i'm 
confused why we reference the Flink code, to prove what ?

> 4 bytes to the Cons data structure to serve his purpose

Just like Julian said, Cons is a basic data structure, it can be used in many 
codes, but digest is a planner internal thing, it is better if we can avoid 
theses duplicate object references, but it is not necessary from my side if we 
can make the code more concise.



> Add Digest interface to enable efficient hashCode(equals) for RexNode and 
> RelNode
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3786
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3786
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.21.0
>            Reporter: Vladimir Sitnikov
>            Assignee: Danny Chen
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.24.0
>
>          Time Spent: 8h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Current digests for RexNode, RelNode, RelType, and similar cases use String 
> concatenation.
> It is easy to implement, however, it has drawbacks:
> 1) String objects cannot be reused. For instance, RexCall has operands, 
> however, the digest is duplicated. It causes extra memory use and extra CPU 
> for string copying
> 2) There's no way to have multiple #toString() methods. RelType might need 
> multiple digests: "including field names", "excluding field names".
> A suggested resolution might be behind the lines of
> {code:java}
> class Digest { // immutable
>   final int hashCode; // speedup hashCode and equals
>   final Object[] contents; // The values are either other Digest objects or 
> Strings
>   String toString(); // e.g. for debugging purposes
>   int compareTo(Digest); // e.g. for debugging purposes.
> }
> {code}
> Note how fields in Kotlin are aligned much better, and it makes it easier to 
> read:
> {code:java}
> class Digest { // immutable
>   val hashCode: Int // speedup hashCode and equals
>   val contents: Array<Any> // The values are either other Digest objects or 
> Strings
>   fun toString(): String // e.g. for debugging purposes
>   fun compareTo(other: Digest): Int // e.g. for debugging purposes.
> }
> {code}
> Then the digest for RexCall could be the bits relevant to RexCall itself + 
> digests of the operands (which can be reused as is)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to