[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17147757#comment-17147757 ]
Dawid Wysakowicz commented on CALCITE-4085: ------------------------------------------- [~rubenql] Don't get me wrong. I don't want to insist on that. I was just asked about an opinion. I think it would not harm, but I totally get your point that you don't want to change that piece of code. > Improve nullability support for fields of structured type > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CALCITE-4085 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4085 > Project: Calcite > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core > Reporter: Dawid Wysakowicz > Assignee: Dawid Wysakowicz > Priority: Major > Time Spent: 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > As discussed in > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r602ac95fff23dd1ef974fb396df7be061ab861384ec42f5c57ce0bc2%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E > I would like to change the way a type of a field of a record is derived at > couple of locations. This helps frameworks such as Apache Flink to build > support for nullable records with not null fields. > I suggest to change: > * SqlDotOperator#deriveType > * SqlItemOperator#inferReturnType > * AliasNamespace#validateImpl > * RexBuilder#makeFieldAccessInternal > * SqlValidatorImpl.DeriveTypeVisitor#visit(SqlIdentifier) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)