[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17175678#comment-17175678
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3923:
--------------------------------------
Java lets you define a public field whose type is not public. Java's rules for
this are messed up. You'd hope that Java would treat it as an instance of its
nearest public base class, but apparently it doesn't.
Have you tried instead
{code}
private static final Predicate<LogicalCalc> MY_PREDICATE = ...;
private static final RelOptRule MY_ENUMERABLE_CALC_RULE = ((ConverterRule)
EnumerableRules.ENUMERABLE_CALC_RULE).config
.withConversion(LogicalCalc.class, MY_PREDICATE, Convention.NONE,
EnumerableConvention.INSTANCE, "MyEnumerableCalcRule")
.toRule();
{code}
> Refactor how planner rules are parameterized
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-3923
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3923
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Julian Hyde
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.25.0
>
> Time Spent: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> People often want different variants of planner rules. An example is
> {{FilterJoinRule}}, which has a 'boolean smart’ parameter, a predicate (which
> returns whether to pull up filter conditions), operands (which determine the
> precise sub-classes of {{RelNode}} that the rule should match) and a
> {{RelBuilderFactory}} (which controls the type of {{RelNode}} created by this
> rule).
> Suppose you have an instance of {{FilterJoinRule}} and you want to change
> {{smart}} from true to false. The {{smart}} parameter is immutable (good!)
> but you can’t easily create a clone of the rule because you don’t know the
> values of the other parameters. Your instance might even be (unbeknownst to
> you) a sub-class with extra parameters and a private constructor.
> So, my proposal is to put all of the config information of a {{RelOptRule}}
> into a single {{config}} parameter that contains all relevant properties.
> Each sub-class of {{RelOptRule}} would have one constructor with just a
> ‘config’ parameter. Each config knows which sub-class of {{RelOptRule}} to
> create. Therefore it is easy to copy a config, change one or more properties,
> and create a new rule instance.
> Adding a property to a rule’s config does not require us to add or deprecate
> any constructors.
> The operands are part of the config, so if you have a rule that matches a
> {{EnumerableFilter}} on an {{EnumerableJoin}} and you want to make it match
> an {{EnumerableFilter}} on an {{EnumerableNestedLoopJoin}}, you can easily
> create one with one changed operand.
> The config is immutable and self-describing, so we can use it to
> automatically generate a unique description for each rule instance.
> (See the email thread [[DISCUSS] Refactor how planner rules are
> parameterized|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfdf6f9b7821988bdd92b0377e3d293443a6376f4773c4c658c891cf9%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E].)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
