[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17202970#comment-17202970 ]
Danny Chen commented on CALCITE-4238: ------------------------------------- The PR looks good. Except that i think we should change the file name `default_parser` to `default_config` because it is not really a "parser". > Create a default parser configuration, to reduce redundant information in > sub-parsers > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CALCITE-4238 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4238 > Project: Calcite > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Julian Hyde > Assignee: Julian Hyde > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 1.26.0 > > Time Spent: 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Create a default parser configuration, to reduce redundant information in > sub-parsers. In particular, each sub-project parser would not need its own > list of non-reserved keywords (currently the list is over 250 keywords, and > the list is identical in each sub-parser). > Since CALCITE-2405 each sub-parser has its own list of non-reserved keywords. > This is good, because it allows the sub-parser to make keywords non-reserved > (e.g. in DRILL-1065 Drill wanted {{EXEC}} [to be > non-reserved|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-1065?focusedCommentId=14903669&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14903669]) > but it still requires each parser to have a list of non-reserved keywords > (see e.g. [the list in Babel > parser|https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/eb4011bb4b9d962c2f8e6767cbee8c23435ef939/babel/src/main/codegen/config.fmpp#L37]). > And if we add a keyword to Calcite, we almost always have to modify the list > in each sub-parser. > This proposal would move the list of default non-reserved keywords to a > shared config file. This would reduce the amount of code in sub-parsers, and > remove the need to edit them when we add a keyword to the base parser. > Also, we would not need to modify each sub-parser each time we add a markup > variable (e.g. when we added {{binaryOperatorsTokens}} and > {{extraBinaryExpressions}} in CALCITE-2843). -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)