[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17311102#comment-17311102
 ] 

James Starr commented on CALCITE-4559:
--------------------------------------

Are these rex rules going to be able to handle rewriting window functions or is 
that not going to be handled?

Concerning the style for expressing selector, I generally prefer where the tree 
is being built up instead of trying to fully wrap it in fluent interface.  I 
find this much easier to read when the expressions get a little more 
complicated because the tree structure being expressed in java mirrors the tree 
structure being written.  Something like the following for your current 2 
examples:
{code:java}
b.call().kindIs(SqlKind.LIKE)
    .inputs(
        b.any(),
        b.literal().valueIs("%"));

  b.call().kindIs(SqlKind.IS_NULL)
    .inputs(
        b.any().notNull(),
        b.any());
{code}


> Create 'interface RexRule', a modular rewrite for row-expressions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-4559
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4559
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Julian Hyde
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>            Priority: Major
>
> We propose to add {{class RexRule}}, a rewrite rule for row-expressions 
> ({{class RexNode}}).
> {{class RexRule}} is analogous to how {{class RelRule}} (and the older 
> {{class RelOptRule}}) operates on relational expressions ({{interface 
> RelNode}}). Also, {{class RexRuleProgram}} is analogous to {{HepProgram}} and 
> {{VolcanoPlanner}} (it indexes rules so that we do not have to try every rule 
> against every part of the expression). And a rule describes which operands it 
> matches using {{RexRule.describe(RexRule.OperandBuilder)}}, similar to 
> calling {{RelRule.Config.operandSupplier().apply()}}.
> The advantages of {{RexRule}} are similar to {{RelRule}}: rules can be 
> defined in a modular way, can be documented and tested individually, and can 
> be enabled individually.
> The rules could be applied in various ways. {{RelBuilder.Config}} could 
> contain a {{RexRuleProgram}} that would be applied every time an expression 
> is simplified by a {{RelBuilder}}. There could also be a sub-class of 
> {{interface RelShuttle}} that applies the rules to every {{RexNode}} in a 
> tree (e.g. inside {{Filter}}, {{Project}} and {{Join}}).
> I don't yet know whether, or how, rules might support 3-valued boolean logic 
> ({{RexUnknownAs}}). For example, a rule that simplifies "x = x" to "TRUE" is 
> valid in an "unknownAsFalse" context (e.g. as top-level of {{Filter}} 
> condition), but not in an "unknownAsUnknown" context (e.g. in {{Project}} 
> expression).
> This case is related to CALCITE-3470 (making relational and row-expression 
> rules more similar, as in CockroachDB), but would deliver an API rather than 
> a textual DSL.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to