[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17690859#comment-17690859
 ] 

Jiajun Xie commented on CALCITE-5518:
-------------------------------------

[~julianhyde], your advice is useful. 
Thank you very much!

> RelToSql converter generates invalid order of ROLLUP fields
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-5518
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5518
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jdbc-adapter
>    Affects Versions: 1.32.0
>            Reporter: Leonid Chistov
>            Assignee: Jiajun Xie
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> RelToSqlConverter generates wrong code for Aggregate nodes with grouping sets 
> classified as `ROLLUP` grouping but with order of rollup not matching order 
> of grouping fields.
> This can be demonstrated by the following test, that would fail if added to 
> RelToSqlConverterTest class:
> {code:java}
> @Test void testGroupingSetsRollupNonNaturalOrder() {
>   final String query = "select \"product_class_id\", \"brand_name\"\n"
>       + "from \"product\"\n"
>       + "group by GROUPING SETS ((\"product_class_id\", \"brand_name\"),"
>       + " (\"brand_name\"), ())\n";
>   final String expected = "SELECT \"product_class_id\", \"brand_name\"\n"
>       + "FROM \"foodmart\".\"product\"\n"
>       + "GROUP BY ROLLUP (\"brand_name\", \"product_class_id\")";
>   sql(query)
>       .withPostgresql().ok(expected);
> }{code}
> As the result we get the following SQL code:
> {code:java}
> SELECT product_class_id, brand_name
> FROM foodmart.product
> GROUP BY ROLLUP(product_class_id, brand_name){code}
> While the correct code would be:
> {code:java}
> SELECT product_class_id, brand_name
> FROM foodmart.product
> GROUP BY ROLLUP(brand_name, product_class_id){code}
> Source of the bug is that we treat grouping sets \{0, 1}, \{1}, {} as rollup 
> grouping, but right after that we generate SQL code as if grouping sets were 
> \{0, 1}, \{0}, {}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to