[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17693279#comment-17693279 ]
TJ Banghart edited comment on CALCITE-5357 at 2/24/23 5:17 PM: --------------------------------------------------------------- [~julianhyde] those changes look great - thank you for taking the time to review and fix up the PR! I think the next step is allowing for these format functions to be unparsed in the target SQL dialect. I can create a new ticket off of [CALCITE-2980|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2980] to track that work. was (Author: tjbanghart): [~julianhyde] those changes look great - thank you for taking the time to review and fix up the PR! I think the next step is allowing for these format functions to be unparsed in the target SQL dialect. I can create a new ticket off of [CALCITE-2980|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2980] if that sounds good. > Implement BigQuery FORMAT_TIMESTAMP, FORMAT_DATE > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: CALCITE-5357 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5357 > Project: Calcite > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: core > Reporter: TJ Banghart > Assignee: TJ Banghart > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Time Spent: 6h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)