[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17827109#comment-17827109
]
Calvin Kirs commented on CALCITE-6331:
--------------------------------------
It looks like we used a script to organize the license files under
https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/f0dc2b0aea46b1fd3f37e0cc126edaf82ade2344/src/main/config/licenses.
This is consistent with the pointers in the LICENSE file in the root
directory.（Additional License files can be found in the 'licenses' folder
located in the same directory as the LICENSE file (i.e. this file))
I'm curious to ask, why not put it directly in the correct location, but
instead use a script to do it when packaging?
> The third-party source code file doesn't have a License file.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-6331
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6331
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Calvin Kirs
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> [https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/main/LICENSE#L184-L196]
> We reference these third-party source code files but don't provide the
> corresponding LICENSE files.
> FYI : [https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#license-file]
>
> Here is the MIT license:
>
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
> of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
> in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
> to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
> copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
> furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright
> notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or
> substantial portions of the Software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
