[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13918330#comment-13918330
 ] 

Yoshikazu Nojima commented on CLOUDSTACK-6191:
----------------------------------------------

To be the best of my knowledge, only qcow2 distinguishes "thin" and "sparse", 
but most of the hypervisors distinguish "thin" and "fat". Anyway, as you 
indicated, it's best implemented as a disk offering parameter. I updated the 
design doc. Thanks!

> Volume provisioning type option
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-6191
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6191
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: KVM, Management Server
>            Reporter: Yoshikazu Nojima
>            Assignee: Yoshikazu Nojima
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Future
>
>
> Thin provisioning of a volume saves consumption of a storage, and fat 
> provisioning minimizes IOPS performance overhead.
> This feature implements a global setting to provide users an option to select 
> how to provision volumes.
> Design doc:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Volume+provisioning+type+option



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to