[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13925629#comment-13925629
]
Nux commented on CLOUDSTACK-6181:
---------------------------------
Marcus,
Thanks for the tip, it worked great and the root was resized to my specified
value. This is with NFS, but will try also local, CLVM and gluster.
One thing though, my test template size is 1.9G and the api happily accepted
"details[0].rootdisksize=1"; given that 1 < 1.9 shouldn't it have errored out
or something?
The VM ended up with the template size, 1.9.
> Root resize
> -----------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-6181
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6181
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Hypervisor Controller, Storage Controller, UI
> Affects Versions: 4.4.0
> Environment: KVM/libvirt/CentOS, Xenserver
> Reporter: Nux
> Labels: disk, resize, template
> Fix For: 4.4.0
>
>
> Rationale:
> Currently the root size of an instance is locked to that of the template.
> This creates unnecessary template duplicates, prevents the creation of a
> market place, wastes time and disk space and generally makes work more
> complicated.
> Real life example - a small VPS provider might want to offer the following
> sizes (in GB):
> 10,20,40,80,160,240,320,480,620
> That's 9 offerings.
> The template selection could look like this, including real disk space used:
> Windows 2008 ~10GB
> Windows 2008+Plesk ~15GB
> Windows 2008+MSSQL ~15GB
> Windows 2012 ~10GB
> Windows 2012+Plesk ~15GB
> Windows 2012+MSSQL ~15GB
> CentOS ~1GB
> CentOS+CPanel ~3GB
> CentOS+Virtualmin ~3GB
> CentOS+Zimbra ~3GB
> CentOS+Docker ~2GB
> Debian ~1GB
> Ubuntu LTS ~1GB
> In this case the total disk space used by templates will be 828 GB, that's
> almost 1 TB. If your storage is expensive and limited SSD this can get
> painful!
> If the root resize feature is enabled we can reduce this to under 100 GB.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
