[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14041088#comment-14041088
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6854:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Commit f7dd1720cb6217d4425e9a92268f6b716e88a18c in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/4.4 from [~yasker]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=f7dd172 ]

CLOUDSTACK-6854: Fix inconsistent IPv6 address formats

fc00:0003:1373::0002 should be treated the same as fc00:3:1373::2.
(cherry picked from commit dfe20f34f2e72335586b0e014ba1f91aa4ed473e)


> MS:IPv6: IP6 network address with notation differences are treated as same IP
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-6854
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6854
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: Management Server
>    Affects Versions: 4.4.0
>            Reporter: Parth Jagirdar
>            Assignee: Sheng Yang
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 4.4.0
>
>         Attachments: Screen Shot 2014-06-05 at 11.42.09 AM.png, 
> management-server.log.zip
>
>
> Observed in a dual stack deployment,
> A router and a virtual machines were assigned same IP from IPv6 range.
> The only difference was the notation, so it may be the case that notation 
> differences are not being interpret by management server correctly.
> fc00:0003:1373::0002 was assigned to router and
> fc00:3:1373::2 was assigned to the guest VM.
> Please refer to the attached screen and logs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to