[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14222665#comment-14222665
 ] 

Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-5426:
-----------------------------------------

Thanks for confirming [~prachidamle], do you think it's related to the issue of 
the failing integration smoke test on 4.3 branch - a test 
(test_01_sys_vm_start) fails with Simulator as the deployment planner fails to 
find a storage pool when systemvms are started using simulator. Reference build 
job - https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/jobs/41867306

> Cannot deploy instance having multiple volumes that use different storage 
> tags for storage pools in same cluster
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-5426
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5426
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: Management Server
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.0, 4.2.1, 4.3.0
>            Reporter: Prachi Damle
>            Assignee: Prachi Damle
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 4.3.0
>
>
> This issue can be observed when VM being deployed has multiple volumes (>=2) 
> where 2 adjacent volumes are to be created with 2 different disk offerings 
> with different storage tags.
> Ex:
> 1. VM1 has 2 volumes root volume & 1 data volume.
> 2. root volume is to be created using a disk offering with storage tag 
> 'root_disk'
> 3. data volume is to be created using a disk offering with storage tag 
> 'data_disk'
> 4. There exists a cluster wide storage pool suitable for root volume with 
> storage tag 'root_disk'
> 5. There exists a cluster wide storage pool suitable for data volume with 
> storage tag 'data_disk'
> The deploy VM fails in this case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to