[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14901103#comment-14901103
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-8851:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Commit d543e2aa2c05422559d866c8b2ae29c83bfd5da0 in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~remibergsma]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=d543e2a ]

Merge pull request #839 from bvbharatk/CLOUDSTACK-8851

CLOUDSTACK-8851 Redundant VR getting started in the same cluster or hwe are not 
populating the deployment destination of the previous rvr in the avoid set of 
the rvr that is being created. This was resulting in both the rvrs getting 
deployed to same host sometimes even when it
could have gone to a different one.

Now we are updating the avoids set of the deployment plan  to fix this issue.

* pr/839:
  CLOUDSTACK-8851 Redundant VR getting started in the same cluster or host even 
when there are suitable hosts available

Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <git...@remi.nl>


> Redundant VR getting started in the same cluster or host even when there are 
> suitable hosts available.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8851
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8851
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>            Reporter: Bharat Kumar
>            Assignee: Bharat Kumar
>
> Issue
> =====
> Redundant VR getting started in the same cluster or some time in same host
> CloudStack often starts both of redundant VRs in same Cluster and what is 
> worse, Cloudstack sometimes starts both of redundant VRs in same host. if due 
> to some reason if this host gets effected both the redundant routes get 
> effected.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to