[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14982434#comment-14982434 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9011: ------------------------------------------------------------- Commit bc5a5d662340030fe8f3182f4b3385682a890c47 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~remibergsma] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=bc5a5d6 ] Merge pull request #1006 from greenqloud/user_vm_keypairs_fix Fixed user_vm_view to only display keypairs belonging to the account.The user_vm_view displayes the keypair information by joining vm_details with ssh_keypairs on the key value exclusively. We found a scenario in which this can cause information leakage. If there are two accounts using the same key, but create a different key name for it, and then a vm is created using one of the keys, the view will list both keypairs as belonging to the vm, which can in turn cause confusion to the users who see a keypair name which they did not create. The fix simply limits the view to displaying keypairs which belong to vm's account. I added it to the latest schema migration only; should I also include it in the previous ones? * pr/1006: CLOUDSTACK-9011 - Fixed user_vm_view to only display keypairs belonging to the account. Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <git...@remi.nl> > user_vm_view does not check for account_id of keypairs > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9011 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9011 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Reporter: Nera NEsic > Priority: Minor > > If there are two accounts using the same key, but create a different key name > for it, and then a vm is created using one of the keys, the view will list > both keypairs as belonging to the vm, which can in turn cause confusion to > the users who see a keypair name which they did not create. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)