[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15215879#comment-15215879 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9099: -------------------------------------------- Github user kansal commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1152#issuecomment-202844861 @DaanHoogland I am not sure of the amount of work that needs to be done for fixing all the existing test cases. Will revisit this and update. I still personally think that going with the optional parameter presently and assuming( and making sure) that the new test cases are written in compliance with this API will be a good way to go forward. Your views? PS: I am still not very versed with the test case suits. Will check and revisit this. > SecretKey is returned from the APIs > ----------------------------------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9099 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Reporter: Kshitij Kansal > Assignee: Kshitij Kansal > > The sercreKey parameter is returned from the following APIs: > createAccount > createUser > disableAccount > disableUser > enableAccount > enableUser > listAccounts > listUsers > lockAccount > lockUser > registerUserKeys > updateAccount > updateUser -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)