[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15215879#comment-15215879
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9099:
--------------------------------------------
Github user kansal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1152#issuecomment-202844861
@DaanHoogland I am not sure of the amount of work that needs to be done for
fixing all the existing test cases. Will revisit this and update. I still
personally think that going with the optional parameter presently and assuming(
and making sure) that the new test cases are written in compliance with this
API will be a good way to go forward. Your views?
PS: I am still not very versed with the test case suits. Will check and
revisit this.
> SecretKey is returned from the APIs
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9099
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9099
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Reporter: Kshitij Kansal
> Assignee: Kshitij Kansal
>
> The sercreKey parameter is returned from the following APIs:
> createAccount
> createUser
> disableAccount
> disableUser
> enableAccount
> enableUser
> listAccounts
> listUsers
> lockAccount
> lockUser
> registerUserKeys
> updateAccount
> updateUser
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
