[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15235086#comment-15235086
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9203:
--------------------------------------------
GitHub user DaanHoogland reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297
CLOUDSTACK-9203 Implement security group move on updateVM API call
cherry-picked from a exoscale internal fix
Conflicts:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/vm/UpdateVMCmd.java
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManager.java
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/DaanHoogland/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9203
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1297
----
commit c1040f0fb004c2aa4f39d8d8c195f9334a7b6014
Author: Loic Lambiel <[email protected]>
Date: 2015-05-13T14:43:09Z
CLOUDSTACK-9203 Implement security group move on updateVM API call
cherry-picked from a exoscale internal fix
Conflicts:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/vm/UpdateVMCmd.java
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManager.java
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java
commit acf33f24a1cbdacef1bd9ce6defd3def703f9433
Author: Daan Hoogland <[email protected]>
Date: 2015-12-30T12:13:38Z
CLOUDSTACK-9203 refactorred DeployVM code to be used by UpdateVM as well
commit bf7ab1f2d6ab1f568772b242a9b3018fb589f85e
Author: Loic Lambiel <[email protected]>
Date: 2015-05-15T13:15:26Z
CLOUDSTACK-9203 Prevent security group update while instance is running
cherry-picked from a exoscale internal fix
Conflicts:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/vm/UpdateVMCmd.java
commit 0aff983cc81895a45295df6671b584d45975453e
Author: Wei Zhou <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-01-12T09:56:07Z
CLOUDSTACK-9203: fix issue if there are multiple shared networks
commit 6ac415d8d4155c591acf1130f8bc445497993a33
Author: Daan Hoogland <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-01-12T10:10:30Z
Merge pull request #3 from
ustcweizhou/CLOUDSTACK-9203-multiple-shared-networks
LGTM, exoscale probably only uses basic zone, so we need this extra.
CLOUDSTACK-9203: fix issue if there are multiple shared networks
commit be86551bc8cece5f619e9e54c04c9ec5f43fd6da
Author: Wei Zhou <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-01-22T11:45:13Z
CLOUDSTACK-9203: fix issue when update vm in isolated networks
commit 4e86f9a6c83d4c94a0f947e9070854da84f5bada
Author: Daan Hoogland <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-01-22T13:16:22Z
Merge pull request #4 from
ustcweizhou/CLOUDSTACK-9203-updatevm-isolated-network
CLOUDSTACK-9203: fix issue when update vm in isolated networks
----
> [API] extend updateVirtualMachine to support updating security groups
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9203
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9203
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: API
> Reporter: René Moser
> Assignee: Daan Hoogland
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Future
>
>
> There is currently no way to change security groups on exisitng VMs.
> {{updateVirtualMachine}} should be extended in a similar way as
> {{deployVirtualMachine}} which should allow passing a list of IDs or names to
> update the security groups as passed:
> {{securitygroupids}} parameter
> comma separated list of security groups id that going to be applied to the
> virtual machine. Should be passed only when vm is created from a zone with
> Basic Network support. Mutually exclusive with securitygroupnames parameter,
> default: false
> {{securitygroupnames}} parameter
> comma separated list of security groups names that going to be applied to the
> virtual machine. Should be passed only when vm is created from a zone with
> Basic Network support. Mutually exclusive with securitygroupids parameter.
> default: false
> Exoscale did already some work in their branch which we are
> [allowed|https://twitter.com/resmo79/status/681428989018267648] to use, see
> [https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack/pull/6/]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
