[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15683768#comment-15683768
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-8781:
--------------------------------------------

Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/756
  
    @rhtyd Here are the screen-shots without and with this UI bug fix:
    
    
![6a4ded44-adb4-4821-bceb-3eb8c44c79f8](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3722369/20486648/d037587a-b000-11e6-9cda-f82e52747626.jpg)
    
    
![rsz_screenshot_from_2016-11-21_15-15-52](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3722369/20486654/d65af0ae-b000-11e6-9201-d2df4e8bcd7f.jpg)
    
    As pointed out by @nlivens in the previous comment, "The actual Public Load 
Balancer provider is derived from the VPC offering, and not from this extra 
field "Public Load Balancer Provider". So, this field has no use at all since 
it's completely ignored."
    
    The cleaner implementation for this UI tab would be to only list "Public 
Load Balancer Providers" mentioned in the selected VPC offering. Moreover, 
don't show this tab, if there are no "Public Load Balancer Providers" being 
mentioned in the selected VPC offering. Finally, make use of the selected  
"Public Load Balancer Provider" in the actual implementation of the VPC.


> Superfluous field during VPC creation
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8781
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: UI
>    Affects Versions: 4.6.0
>            Reporter: Nick Livens
>            Assignee: Nick Livens
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: Future
>
>         Attachments: addVpc.png
>
>
> When creating a VPC, there is a superfluous field "Public Load Balancer 
> Provider" which is being ignored since the LB Provider is specified in the 
> VPC offering. This might confuse the users whether they can use a different 
> LB provider than the one specified in the VPC offering.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to