[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15880252#comment-15880252 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-8239: -------------------------------------------- Github user wido commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955#discussion_r102687170 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java --- @@ -2216,6 +2225,8 @@ public int compare(final DiskTO arg0, final DiskTO arg1) { disk.setCacheMode(DiskDef.DiskCacheMode.valueOf(volumeObjectTO.getCacheMode().toString().toUpperCase())); } } + + s_logger.debug("Adding disk: " + disk.toString()); --- End diff -- Same here, please include the name of the VM Also, do we really need all these logging lines? > Add support for VirtIO-SCSI for KVM hypervisors > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-8239 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8239 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: New Feature > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: KVM, Storage Controller > Affects Versions: 4.6.0 > Environment: KVM > Reporter: Andrei Mikhailovsky > Assignee: Wido den Hollander > Priority: Critical > Labels: ceph, gsoc2017, kvm, libvirt, rbd, storage_drivers, > virtio > Fix For: Future > > > It would be nice to have support for virtio-scsi for KVM hypervisors. > The reason for using virtio-scsi instead of virtio-blk would be increasing > the number of devices you can attach to a vm, have ability to use discard and > reclaim unused blocks from the backend storage like ceph rbd. There are also > talks about having a greater performance advantage as well. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)