[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15962496#comment-15962496
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9782:
--------------------------------------------
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960
@koushik-das I see that main issue is that this is being confused as VM HA
framework. Will like to again add that this framework is not for VM-HA but for
host HA. With this implementation of OOBM framework, Cloudstack is now in the
position to control and HA a host. These developments helped us in putting
together a Host HA framework. Only that while designing and coding we tried to
keep it flexible so that later other entities that can be HAed can be added to
the framework.
> Host HA
> -------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9782
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9782
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Reporter: Rohit Yadav
> Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> Fix For: Future, 4.11.0.0
>
>
> CloudStack lacks a way to reliably fence a host, the idea of the host-ha
> feature is to provide a general purpose HA framework and implementation
> specific for hypervisor that can use additional mechanism such as OOBM (ipmi
> based power management) to reliably investigate, recover and fencing a host.
> This feature can handle scenarios associated with server crash issues and
> reliable fencing of hosts and HA of VM.
> FS: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Host+HA
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
