[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16330734#comment-16330734
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9749:
--------------------------------------------

blueorangutan commented on issue #2409: CLOUDSTACK-9749: Fix Password server 
running on internal LB VM
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2409#issuecomment-358702895
 
 
   Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-1660

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> cloudstack master vpc_internal_lb feature is broken as port 8080 is in use by 
> password server on lb VM
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9749
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9749
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>    Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0, 4.9.2.0, 4.8.2.0, 4.11.0.0
>            Reporter: Raf Smeets
>            Assignee: Frank Maximus
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 4.10.0.0
>
>         Attachments: runinfo.txt
>
>
> cloudstack master vpc_internal_lb feature is broken as port 8080 is in use by 
> password server on lb VM
> Executed test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/test_nuage_vpc_internal_lb.py 
> which failed in test_05_nuage_internallb_traffic at the point where it is 
> checking the lb via wget of file using port 8080.
> As port 8080 already is occupied by the password_server, it fails.
> I have added the runinfo.txt of the failing test to this bugticket.
> Similar issue was reported internally via CLOUD-972.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to