[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12537841
 ] 

Henri Yandell commented on LANG-362:
------------------------------------

General idea sounds good.

Here's a dump of thoughts - I'll try to look more tomorrow night, and have a 
lot of time on Saturday.

* Ack, lots of new classes in text. I wonder if commons.lang.format would be a 
tidier place.

* MetaFormat seems to be a crux interface, but the javadoc is tiny.

* reverse(Map) confused me - my first thought was 'HashMaps don't have order'. 
Invert is a better name (and you use it in the javadoc).

* MultiFormat is a completely separate class - we should have a different JIRA 
item for that. I feel that this has come up before, but maybe I'm thinking of 
CompositeFormat. Needs a unit test focused on this, rather than the hook in in 
MessageFormatExtension [assuming I'm right and this is a class that can be used 
separately from the rest of it].

* MultiFormat.Builder - what does 'fluent interface' mean? And what are the 
Builder classes for in this and NameKeyedMetaFormat, nothing uses them - until 
I looked in the Tests and saw them using them - not a common pattern for Lang 
and definitely something that if we keep it would need strong documentation. 

* DefaultMetaFormatFactory - This makes me think there is a way of replacing it 
with another. Is there? If not, is the Default necessary?

* Various 'non-Javadoc' bits in there. IDE spam?

[Sorry it's not a very deep look yet]

> Add ExtendedMessageFormat to org.apache.commons.lang.text
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LANG-362
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-362
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Matt Benson
>            Assignee: Matt Benson
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.4
>
>         Attachments: extendedMessageFormat.patch.txt
>
>
> Discussed on dev@ ( 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/200710.mbox/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED] ); adding here for tracking purposes and in case anyone has any 
> serious objections to my implementation.  Patch forthcoming...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to