[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12600340#action_12600340
]
Matt Benson commented on IO-158:
--------------------------------
Is there something in particular that makes the openide implementation superior
to one already living in the ASF? The Piped*Stream implementation? I am still
scarred from some of the hacking I have had to do to deal with Piped*Stream
interaction and threads in Ant code. What about this implementation is so
attractive?
> ReaderInputStream implementation
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: IO-158
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-158
> Project: Commons IO
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Andreas Veithen
> Priority: Minor
>
> The standard Java class InputStreamReader converts a Reader into an
> InputStream. In some cases it is necessary to do the reverse, i.e. to convert
> a Reader into an InputStream. Several frameworks and libraries have their own
> implementation of this functionality (google for "ReaderInputStream"). Among
> these are at least four Apache projects: Ant, iBatis, James and XMLBeans.
> Commons IO would be a good place to share a common implementation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
