[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17427747#comment-17427747
]
Alex Herbert commented on NUMBERS-167:
--------------------------------------
I do not think BC allows a switch to enums as the methods change from static to
instance.
{code:java}
public enum RegularizedGamma {
P {
@Override
public double value(double a,
double x) {
return value(a, x, DEFAULT_EPSILON, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
}
@Override
public double value(double a,
double x,
double epsilon,
int maxIterations) {
throw new IllegalStateException();
}
},
Q {
@Override
public double value(double a,
double x) {
return value(a, x, DEFAULT_EPSILON, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
}
@Override
public double value(double a,
double x,
double epsilon,
int maxIterations) {
throw new IllegalStateException();
}
};
private static final double DEFAULT_EPSILON = 1e-15;
public abstract double value(double a, double x);
public abstract double value(double a,
double x,
double epsilon,
int maxIterations);
}
{code}
This fails JApiCmp:
{noformat}
mvn package japicmp
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
com.github.siom79.japicmp:japicmp-maven-plugin:0.14.3:cmp (default-cli) on
project commons-numbers-gamma: There is at least one incompatibility:
org.apache.commons.numbers.gamma.RegularizedGamma.value(double,double):METHOD_ABSTRACT_ADDED_TO_CLASS,org.apache.commons.numbers.gamma.RegularizedGamma.value(double,double,double,int):METHOD_ABSTRACT_ADDED_TO_CLASS,org.apache.commons.numbers.gamma.RegularizedGamma:CLASS_NOW_ABSTRACT,org.apache.commons.numbers.gamma.RegularizedGamma:CLASS_TYPE_CHANGED,org.apache.commons.numbers.gamma.RegularizedGamma$P.value(double,double):METHOD_REMOVED,org.apache.commons.numbers.gamma.RegularizedGamma$P.value(double,double,double,int):METHOD_REMOVED,org.apache.commons.numbers.gamma.RegularizedGamma$P:SUPERCLASS_REMOVED,org.apache.commons.numbers.gamma.RegularizedGamma$P:CLASS_REMOVED,org.apache.commons.numbers.gamma.RegularizedGamma$Q.value(double,double):METHOD_REMOVED,org.apache.commons.numbers.gamma.RegularizedGamma$Q.value(double,double,double,int):METHOD_REMOVED,org.apache.commons.numbers.gamma.RegularizedGamma$Q:SUPERCLASS_REMOVED,org.apache.commons.numbers.gamma.RegularizedGamma$Q:CLASS_REMOVED
-> [Help 1]
{noformat}
> RegularizedGamma.P with precomputed LogGamma value
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUMBERS-167
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-167
> Project: Commons Numbers
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: gamma
> Reporter: Gilles Sadowski
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.1
>
> Attachments: pr_106.patch
>
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We have
> {code:java}
> double v = RegularizedGamma.P.value(a, x);
> {code}
> where method {{value}} internally calls {{LogGamma.value(a)}}.
> There is a use-case for
> {code:java}
> double logGammaA = LogGamma.value(a);
> double v = RegularizedGamma.P.value(a, x, logGammaA);
> {code}
> for when the user varies {{x}} but not {{a}}.
> Method name TBD: Another overload of {{value}} may be confusing (?).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)