[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18073704#comment-18073704
 ] 

Bruno Antunes commented on FILEUPLOAD-368:
------------------------------------------

For reference, I also tested this with ** Commons FileUpload 1.6.1-SNAPSHOT 
(20260410.123442-14).

The observed behavior is consistent with ** 1.6.0:
 * When the {{InputStream}} returned by {{FileItem.getInputStream()}} is not 
explicitly closed:
 ** Temporary files are unlinked after GC
 ** File descriptors remain open and appear as {{(deleted)}} in {{lsof +L1}}
 * When the stream is explicitly closed:
 ** No descriptor retention is observed

This suggests the behavior has not changed in the current snapshot.

> 1.6.0 unlike 1.5:  brought on an issue where temporary files and descriptors 
> were not being freed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FILEUPLOAD-368
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-368
>             Project: Commons FileUpload
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.0
>            Reporter: David Campbell
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: image-2025-12-02-13-22-04-101.png, 
> image-2025-12-02-13-24-56-498.png
>
>
> An upgrade of commons-fileupload from 1.5 to 1.6.0 brought on a problem on 
> high-load servers where uploaded files were not being deleted and the server 
> file descriptor utilisation kept growing.  On all server instances, file 
> resource utilisation kept growing to the point where it was filling /tmp 
> completely and then the server instances needed restarting to solve, as file 
> space is not reclaimed even on file deletion on Unix servers when file 
> descriptors are still open.  The same issue occurred on all our server 
> instances.
> We had a major production incident as a result.
> Rolled back to 1.5.  That fixed the issue, problem completely gone.
> Don't know any further details of the whys at this point.
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to