sahvx655-wq opened a new pull request, #431:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-validator/pull/431

   `adjustForLineEnding` subtracts one character for every CR and every LF it 
counts, but adds `lineEndLength` back only once per LF, so it quietly assumes 
every carriage return arrives paired with a line feed. I went looking after 
noticing the two `lineEndLength` overloads have no coverage beyond the single 
`"12345\n\r"` fixture, and an unpaired CR turns out to contribute zero to the 
adjusted length: `maxLength("12345\r", 5, 1)` returns true where the adjusted 
length is 6, and `maxLength("\r\r\r\r\r", 1, 2)` returns true because a CR-only 
value adjusts to 0 no matter how long it is. A client picks its own line 
endings in a submitted textarea and nothing normalises them beforehand, so a 
field can be pushed past a declared maximum by an unbounded number of carriage 
returns; `minLength` mirrors it and wrongly rejects `minLength("12345\r", 7, 
2)`, whose adjusted length is exactly 7.
   
   Taking the line-ending count as the greater of the two counters rather than 
the LF count alone is enough, since the number of line endings is bounded below 
by the CR count and by the LF count. Keeping it in the private helper corrects 
both public overloads in one place rather than leaving each caller to normalise 
first, and the paired CRLF and LF-only forms compute exactly as they did, so 
the existing `testMaxLength` and `testMinLength` expectations are untouched. I 
have deliberately left the reversed `"\n\r"` sequence counting as one line 
ending, which is what those tests pin down today; the added regression covers 
the unpaired carriage return only and fails without the runtime change.
   
   Before you push a pull request, review this list:
   
   - [x] Read the [contribution guidelines](CONTRIBUTING.md) for this project.
   - [ ] Read the [ASF Generative Tooling 
Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) if you use 
Artificial Intelligence (AI).
   - [ ] I used AI to create any part of, or all of, this pull request. Which 
AI tool was used to create this pull request, and to what extent did it 
contribute?
   - [x] Run a successful build using the default 
[Maven](https://maven.apache.org/) goal with `mvn`; that's `mvn` on the command 
line by itself.
   - [x] Write unit tests that match behavioral changes, where the tests fail 
if the changes to the runtime are not applied. This may not always be possible, 
but it is a best practice.
   - [x] Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand 
what the pull request does, how, and why.
   - [x] Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line 
and body. Note that a maintainer may squash commits during the merge process.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to