[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053809#comment-13053809
 ] 

Max Tardiveau commented on JEXL-113:
------------------------------------



Hi Henri,

we love Jexl! It's not uncommon for this type of library to be widely used, but 
very much under-recognized. Please know that we use it, and we like it.

After some more thinking about this, I can now see that handling null values is 
a challenge. 

Maybe we could have the option to turn off the dot operator? That would allow 
us to resolve the dot operator in our context class, and perhaps come up with a 
way to handle nulls (e.g. return zero instead of null). This can be done now 
with proxy classes, or by encapsulating beans, but that seems like a lot of 
work.

In the meantime, we're going to turn on silent mode, and let nulls be treated 
as they are now.

Thanks for a valuable library!

-- Max





> Dot notation behaves unexpectedly with null values
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JEXL-113
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-113
>             Project: Commons JEXL
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
>         Environment: JDK 1.6
>            Reporter: Max Tardiveau
>
> When a variable of the form a.b is evaluated, the context is asked first for 
> the value of a. That value is then asked for the value of b.
> So far, so good: this is exactly what you'd expect from the dot operator.
> But if the value of b is null, the context is then asked for the value of 
> a.b, in other words the dot operator is ignored and "a.b" is considered to be 
> a single variable.
> This is at best confusing. Granted, this can be avoided with the a['b'] 
> notation, but that's clumsy.
> I assume this is an attempt to support both the dot operator and ant-style 
> variables. I don't think you can have both and remain sane.
> Suggestion: either document this behavior, or make it an option. My vote 
> would be to just use the value returned, even if it's null. Either dot is an 
> operator, or it's not. Perhaps make that configurable?
> Thanks!

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Reply via email to