[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13064807#comment-13064807
]
Arne Plöse commented on MATH-577:
---------------------------------
Maybe Im a little dumb, but why are Complex.add and Complex.subtract
differently implemented regarding NaN values?
subtract returns Complex.NaN if there is one of both NaN.
Am Mittwoch, den 13.07.2011, 14:47 +0000 schrieb Phil Steitz (JIRA):
I only found your checkin of revision 280031 where you intoduced NaN in
equals, but cant find anything on commons-dev (maybe I got the wrong
keywords hashCode, equals)?
> Enhance Complex.java
> --------------------
>
> Key: MATH-577
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-577
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Arne Plöse
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: Complex.diff, Complex.diff
>
>
> Add some double shorthand methods to Complex fix different NaN checks in add
> and subtract ! Testcase testAddNaN will fail (what should be the result ?)
> What is missing JavaDoc and testcases.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
