[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Max Tardiveau updated JEXL-118:
-------------------------------
Description:
It would be very useful to have an IN operator, e.g.:
status in ['A', 'B', 'C']
that would return a boolean. This can currently be done with :
status == 'A' or status == 'B' or status == 'C'
but (especially for longer lists) the IN operator would be more concise and
more elegant.
Extra bonus points, of course, if this works with variables, e.g.:
status in possibleStatuses
where possibleStatuses would be an object of type Collection.
was:
It would be very useful to have an IN operator, e.g.:
status in ['A', 'B', 'C']
This can currently be done with :
status == 'A' or status == 'B' or status == 'C'
but (especially for longer lists) the IN operator would be more concise and
more elegant.
Extra bonus points, of course, if this works with variables, e.g.:
status in possibleStatuses
where possibleStatuses would be an object of type Collection.
> Provide an IN operator
> ----------------------
>
> Key: JEXL-118
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-118
> Project: Commons JEXL
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 2.0.1
> Reporter: Max Tardiveau
> Labels: features
>
> It would be very useful to have an IN operator, e.g.:
> status in ['A', 'B', 'C']
> that would return a boolean. This can currently be done with :
> status == 'A' or status == 'B' or status == 'C'
> but (especially for longer lists) the IN operator would be more concise and
> more elegant.
> Extra bonus points, of course, if this works with variables, e.g.:
> status in possibleStatuses
> where possibleStatuses would be an object of type Collection.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
