[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dr. Dietmar Wolz updated MATH-621:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: BOBYQAOptimizer0.4.zip

No changes from the perl generated code 
beside the ones necessary to get INDEX_OFFSET=0 working. Introduced 
INDEX_OFFSET where possible but there were
many other adaptions necessary (just compare the perl generated code with the 
attachment). Version 0.3 had some useful 
additional minor changes/refactorings missing here (see remarks below),
but the main work for 0.3 was the index change, and this we have here again. 
Remarks:

1) The perl script has damaged the "for loop" intendation

2) n, npt and nptm should be global variables and not set separately
in each method

3) "System generated locals": Declare variables in the scope they are needed and
not method-globally if not necessary

4) testDiagonalRosen() is a copy/paste leftover from CMAES, should be removed

5) We should shink about removing rescue as proposed by Mike Powell. 



> BOBYQA is missing in optimization
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-621
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-621
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 3.0
>            Reporter: Dr. Dietmar Wolz
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>         Attachments: BOBYQA.math.patch, BOBYQA.v02.math.patch, 
> BOBYQAOptimizer0.4.zip, bobyqa.zip, bobyqa_convert.pl, 
> bobyqaoptimizer0.4.zip, bobyqav0.3.zip
>
>   Original Estimate: 8h
>  Remaining Estimate: 8h
>
> During experiments with space flight trajectory optimizations I recently
> observed, that the direct optimization algorithm BOBYQA
> http://plato.asu.edu/ftp/other_software/bobyqa.zip
> from Mike Powell is significantly better than the simple Powell algorithm
> already in commons.math. It uses significantly lower function calls and is
> more reliable for high dimensional problems. You can replace CMA-ES in many
> more application cases by BOBYQA than by the simple Powell optimizer.
> I would like to contribute a Java port of the algorithm.
> I maintained the structure of the original FORTRAN code, so the
> code is fast but not very nice.
> License status: Michael Powell has sent the agreement via snail mail
> - it hasn't arrived yet.
> Progress: The attached patch relative to the trunk contains both the
> optimizer and the related unit tests - which are all green now.  
> Performance:
> Performance difference (number of function evaluations)
> PowellOptimizer / BOBYQA for different test functions (taken from
> the unit test of BOBYQA, dimension=13 for most of the
> tests. 
> Rosen = 9350 / 1283
> MinusElli = 118 / 59
> Elli = 223 / 58
> ElliRotated = 8626 / 1379
> Cigar = 353 / 60
> TwoAxes = 223 / 66
> CigTab = 362 / 60
> Sphere = 223 / 58
> Tablet = 223 / 58
> DiffPow = 421 / 928
> SsDiffPow = 614 / 219
> Ackley = 757 / 97
> Rastrigin = 340 / 64
> The number for DiffPow should be dicussed with Michael Powell,
> I will send him the details. 
> Open Problems:
> Some checkstyle violations because of the original Fortran source:
> - Original method comments were copied - doesn't follow javadoc standard
> - Multiple variable declarations in one line as in the original source
> - Problems related to "goto" conversions:
>   "gotos" not convertible in loops were transated into a finite automata 
> (switch statement)
>       "no default in switch"
>       "fall through from previos case in switch"
>       which usually are bad style make no sense here.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to