Undocumented and inconsistent behaviour of multi-valued registry entries
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: DAEMON-240
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-240
             Project: Commons Daemon
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Procrun
    Affects Versions: 1.0.8
            Reporter: Sebb


The behaviour of option processing for multi-valued registry entries is partly 
undocumented, and inconsistent.

--Option and ++Option are only documented in the context of a single invocation 
of procrun.

The documentation should be updated to clarify that ++Option can be used in a 
separate invocation of procrun (update service) to append values to the 
registry.

==

The documentation implies that --Option resets the value.
This is only true if the ++Option is not used at the same time - if the 
++Option is used anywhere on the command-line, then all the options are 
appended to any existing value in the registry.

The behaviour of mixed --Option and ++Option should either be fixed so that 
--Option clears any existing settings, or the existing behaviour should be 
documented.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to