[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260518#comment-13260518
]
Jean-Noel Rouvignac commented on LANG-769:
------------------------------------------
Hi Henri,
I agree with David Cogen: these exceptions are the ones I use most!
I am using NotImplementedException to fail fast in case I did not handle a
specific path in the code when I deemed it unnecessary to handle from the start
or when could not foresee changes coming in, like a newly added values to an
enum for example.
Then I am using UnhandledException to bypass the horrid checked exception in
Java which is needed just about all the time.
Please add them back, I miss them so much!
Thanks,
Jean-Noel
> Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-769
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: david cogen
> Priority: Minor
>
> Why were these removed? I found these very useful and used them often. As the
> version 2.6 api javadoc states, "This exception supplements the standard
> exception classes by providing a more semantically rich description of the
> problem."
> Just want you to realize that these have found direct use outside the
> library; not just internal use within commons-lang.
> I will define these missing classes myself, or maybe include both
> commons-lang and commons-lang3 (but I really don't to do that). It would be
> very nice to have these back.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
