[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13461878#comment-13461878
 ] 

Frank Hess edited comment on MATH-867 at 9/25/12 3:09 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------

To elaborate on my previous point, the CMAESOptimizer also doesn't allow mixing 
of bounded and unbounded parameters.  So, if I only want to apply a bound to 
one parameter of a multi-parameter fit, then the best I can do is set the 
bounds of the "unbounded" parameters to be [-VeryLargeValue, +VeryLargeValue].  
This causes the fit precision around zero for the "unbounded" parameters to be 
much worse than when no bounds are specified at all.
                
      was (Author: fhess):
    To elaborate on my previous point, the CMAESOptimizer also doesn't allow 
mixing of bounded and unbounded parameters.  So, if I only want to apply a 
bound to one parameter of a multi-parameter fit, then the best I can do is set 
the bounds of the "unbounded" parameters to be [-VeryLargeValue, 
+VeryLargeValue].  This causes the fit precision around zero for the 
"unbounded" to be much worse than when no bounds are specified at all.
                  
> CMAESOptimizer with bounds fits finely near lower bound and coarsely near 
> upper bound. 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-867
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-867
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Frank Hess
>         Attachments: Math867Test.java
>
>
> When fitting with bounds, the CMAESOptimizer fits finely near the lower bound 
> and coarsely near the upper bound.  This is because it internally maps the 
> fitted parameter range into the interval [0,1].  The unit of least precision 
> (ulp) between floating point numbers is much smaller near zero than near one. 
>  Thus, fits have much better resolution near the lower bound (which is mapped 
> to zero) than the upper bound (which is mapped to one).  I will attach a 
> example program to demonstrate.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to