[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13466309#comment-13466309 ]
Nikolaus Hansen commented on MATH-867: -------------------------------------- {quote} Hence, unless someone wants to try it out, we'll of course trust you and leave the internal boundary handling in place. {quote} I spent several hundreds of hours (really!) to investigate (and try to understand) this with the greatest care I was able to. That of course doesn't mean there could be still surprises out there... > CMAESOptimizer with bounds fits finely near lower bound and coarsely near > upper bound. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MATH-867 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-867 > Project: Commons Math > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Frank Hess > Attachments: MATH867_patch, Math867Test.java > > > When fitting with bounds, the CMAESOptimizer fits finely near the lower bound > and coarsely near the upper bound. This is because it internally maps the > fitted parameter range into the interval [0,1]. The unit of least precision > (ulp) between floating point numbers is much smaller near zero than near one. > Thus, fits have much better resolution near the lower bound (which is mapped > to zero) than the upper bound (which is mapped to one). I will attach a > example program to demonstrate. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira