[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573750#comment-13573750
 ] 

Thomas Neidhart commented on COLLECTIONS-374:
---------------------------------------------

The first test is not relevant anymore, as BeanMap has been removed.

The second test checks symmetry of equals for the following scenario:

{noformat}
 v1 = BoundedFifoBuffer
 v2 = TransformedBuffer(v1)
 v3 = UnmodifiableBuffer(v2)

 v2 == v3 && v3 == v2
{noformat}

this fails because of AbstractCollectionDecorate#equals:

{noformat}
 return object == this || decorated().equals(object);
{noformat}

now v3.equals(v2) evaluates to true, as v3.decorated() == v2
the other way round, v2.equals(v3) if false, as v2.decorated() == v1, and v1 
does not implement equals, thus the default Object.equals() is used, which just 
compares references.
                
> Bug in class#BeanMap and TransformedBuffer with reproducible JUnit test
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COLLECTIONS-374
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-374
>             Project: Commons Collections
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.2
>         Environment: jdk 1.6.0
>            Reporter: Sai Zhang
>         Attachments: ApacheCommons_Documented_Test.java
>
>
> Hi all:
> (as in the previous post)
> I am writing an automated bug finding tool, and using
> Apache Commons Collections as an experimental subject
> for evaluation.
> The tool creates executable JUnit tests as well as
> explanatory code comments. I attached one bug-revealing
> test as follows. Could you please kindly check it, to
> see if it is a real bug or not?
> Also, it would be tremendous helpful if you could give
> some feedback and suggestion on the generated code comments?
> From the perspective of developers who are relatively familiar
> with the code,
> is the automatically-inferred comment useful in understanding
> the generated test? is the comment helpful in bug fixing?
> Your suggestion will help us improve the tool.
> Please see attachment for the failed test. 
> The comment appears in the form of:
> //Tests pass if .... (it gives some small change to the test which can make 
> the failed test pass)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to