[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13641619#comment-13641619
]
Gilles commented on MATH-968:
-----------------------------
Raising the comments formatting issue, again.
We agreed that UTF-8 characters can be used. Should we go further and further
so as to use them in formulae that "translitterates" the code implemented?
Since the Javadoc is mainly intended for Java programmers, I think that the
comment does not need to be excessively "beautified". An additional argument is
that the (plain) Javadoc will never match the "correct" (LaTeX) layout, so that
we are left with a hybrid: part Java statement syntax, part mathematical
notation, part neither (like the caret "^" character when used to represent
exponentiation).
IMHO, in the class Javadoc, it is enough to use links (to "reference" sites).
If necessary, beautified formulae could be added there (and in the user guide).
In a method's Javadoc, I'd tend to stay close to the programming language
syntax.
> Pareto distribution is missing
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: MATH-968
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-968
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 3.2
> Reporter: Alex Gryzlov
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: MATH-968.zip
>
>
> Seems that org.apache.commons.math3.distribution lacks a ParetoDistribution
> for some reason. This is a real common type of distribution, so providing it
> would be very nice!
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
